FreeCapital (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

more fiscally conservative, than socially liberal.

FreeCapital (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Libertarians are more conservative then they are liberals. When there isn't a decent libertarian on the ticket, they'll vote republican. That's what he meant.

FreeCapital (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Your a conservative, because your an independent thinking American. Because you social views are conservative and because you haven't drinking the white man's liberal-laced koolaid. Because you only see white folks in your neighborhood when they come around looking for votes. Because you can never be free until your mentally free and physically free. You figured out the whole equation. Dr. King would be proud....of you, that is. The rest of us have some work to do. This video is a start.

TechnoNubian (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Libertarians and conservatives are different.

eyeearnman (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Great video!

ChristiansMustLearn (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

very well put. we're kindred spirits

francoamerican99 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Libertarianism is a form or branch of the conservative spectrum. You can be libertarian AND conservative. In fact, ALL libertarians are conservatives. Thats what I am!

Sluggo1971 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Refreshing to see someone who still has conservative values put into proper context. It doesn't mean republican, it doesn't mean right-wing zealot, and it certainly doesn't mean racist. Funny how those meanings have been attached through implication by liberal pundits in the media and elsewhere.Stand on your own two feet, take responsibility, and the fact that it takes a mother and a father to give a kid a well rounded homelife are hateful ideas nowadays it seems.Good message.

jblackmel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Bottom line there is no such thing as integration, which is why the so-called "civil rights movement" didn't change the results, although it changed their methods. Either racism (white supremacy) exists or it doesn't. White supremacy "PRODUCES" so-called separation. It's not a matter of integration or separation. It's a matter of whether racism (white surpemacy) exists or not!

jblackmel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

There is no such thing as integration. How is so-called "racial" integration quantified? What determines whether something is so-called integrated, 1, 2, or a few? Follow the logic: During slavery, aunt jemama, in the kitchen was in the house with the white people, "with." Technically, she was integrated becaused she lived amongst the whites. One non-white family amongst 100 white families is technically integrated, if integration means to be with or amongst whites. It makes no logical sense!