Entitled ‘Selling Access’, the clip is another two-minute web piece highlighting Gingrich’s status as a Washington establishment insider who used his position to reap millions for himself.

“He is the absolute symbol of that corrupt system,” a voice over taken from previous news analysis states in the ad. “This guy hasn’t got skeletons in his closets, he’s got a whole graveyard in there,” says another.

Gingrich is heard bragging about earning $60,000 per speech after leaving office and referring to himself as an ‘insider’.

“These are all legitimate and important issues to point out to the American people,” said Ron Paul 2012 National Campaign Chairman Jesse Benton.

“If Americans are serious about changing the status quo in Washington, then they must take into account the record of someone who profited from the housing collapse with taxpayers’ money, advocated for Obamacare-style individual mandates, and who played the Washington game of getting rich due to influence as well as anyone.”

Watch the ad below:

The video is the second Ron Paul ad to focus solely on Gingrich within the last fortnight as he emerged as a front runner in Iowa and New Hampshire.

A previous viral web ad, ‘Serial Hypocrisy’, criticized Gingrich for many of the same issues:

The Paul campaign’s effort to expose Gingrich as an unelectable candidate has not ended there. In a post on Ron Paul’s official 2012 campaign website, Jack Hunter writes “Newt Gingrich wants the Constitution to die.”

“This is not hyperbole and I’m not kidding.” Hunter writes as he points out that in the mid nineties Gingrich penned a foreword to a book called Creating a New Civilization: The Politics of the Third Wave by authors Alvin and Heidi Toffler.

Within the pages of the book the Tofflers make extreme statements, including that they would like to see Jeffersonian democracy die and be replaced:

“Is this “the system” the Tofflers and apparently Gingrich want to “die and be replaced?”” Hunter writes, “Do they want to essentially murder the very basis of American government, law and civilization?”

“Even Mitt Romney at least pretends to support the Constitution. Good Lord, Newt.”

Meanwhile, controversial radio host Michael Savage has offered to give Gingrich $1 million dollars to drop out of the race for the GOP nomination, “for the sake of the nation.”

“Newt Gingrich is unelectable,” Savage wrote on his website.

“If Newt Gingrich really loves this country as much as he says he does, if he really wants what is best for America, he will set his ego aside, call me, and accept my offer. His continued candidacy spells nothing but ruin for conservatives, Republicans, and all true American patriots, One million dollars in exchange for preserving the nation, Newt. I say take the money … and don’t run.”

Article written by Steve Watson
Infowars.com
December 13, 2011

Iowa Blitz: Ron Paul Goes for Newt’s Throat

Ron Paul’s campaign bought airtime in the important caucus state of Iowa in order inform caucus participants about Newt Gingrich’s record not only as a flip-flopper, but a seasoned insider pushing the establishment’s big government agenda of carbon taxes and endless war.

Here is the ad currently running in Iowa. See the entire video below.

A recent Washington Post-ABC News poll in Iowa puts Gingrich at 33 percent with a double-digit lead over his rivals, including Ron Paul.

The television advertisement campaign by the Paul campaign will undoubtedly chip away at this margin as Iowans discover Gingrich’s duplicitous nature.

The Republican Iowa Caucus follows the Ames Straw poll which begins the process of shaping up who the nominee will be. In August, Michele Bachmann beat Ron Paul by less than one percent to take the Ames Straw poll.

Ron Paul has won a number of polls since, indicating his considerable support among Republicans.

He won a Values Voter Summit straw poll in October and a California Republican Party straw poll in September. On October 22, he took 53 percent of the votes to win an Ohio GOP poll. In early November, he won an Iowa straw poll at the National Federation of Republican Assemblies in Des Moines, Iowa with 82 percent of the votes, according to his campaign.

Bachmann scored dismally in the recent Iowa poll – she came in at 8 percent.

Let’s get this ad out far and wide and counter the establishment media effort to push the globalist Newt as the representative of the American people.

Article written by Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com

Rush has been critical of Ron Paul in the past, but despite any differences, Rush says at this juncture America must understand what’s at stake—and that Ron Paul’s plan is the only plan that seriously addresses our current fiscal crisis.

Rush said today: “Ron Paul has a good idea… fooling around the margins isn’t going to get it done… genuine big spending cuts are the only thing that is going to bring us back.”

Here’s a sample of what Rush said,

The plan, authored by Paul's campaign staff at his direction, promises to restore the federal government to its former Constitutionally-limited, smaller-government and less-burdensome place. The plan cuts $1 trillion in federal spending during the first year of a Paul Presidency and delivers a balanced budget in year three of a Paul Presidency.

Download the Ron Paul Restore America Plan

The 60 second spot, which will air as part of a six-figure ad buy in New Hampshire and Iowa, is entitled simply “Trust”.

The video highlights how Paul was one of only four Republican Congressmen to endorse Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign.

“The establishment called him extreme and unelectable, they said he was the wrong man for the job.” the ad begins.

“After Reagan, Sen. Al Gore ran for president pledging to raise taxes and increase spending,” the ad states. “Rick Perry helped lead Al Gore’s campaign to undo the Reagan revolution.”

“Now America must decide who to trust, Al Gore’s Texas cheerleader or the one who stood with Reagan – Ron Paul.” the spot concludes.

The ad continues the Hollywood blockbuster theme used in Paul’s previous two ads, both of which quickly became viral internet hits earlier this Summer.

The Paul campaign has stated that they hope to place the spot on TV during Wednesday’s GOP presidential debate that airs on MSNBC.

Watch the ad:

Back in 1988, Rick Perry supported Al Gore for president. In fact, Perry actually served as Al Gore’s campaign chairman in the state of Texas that year.

When Perry entered the 2012 race just a few weeks ago, he immediately began parroting Ron Paul’s fiscal conservative and anti-big government values.

Unlike Congressman Ron Paul, however, Perry cannot possibly paint himself up as a fiscally responsible anti-establishment candidate.

Under Perry’s governorship, Texas soaked up $22 billion in stimulus money from the federal government’s bailout package.

During his 11 year tenure, Texas has run up a $13.4 billion deficit, which is 31.5% of the 2011 budget. The Lone Star state has the 3rd highest deficit in the entire country behind only California and Illinois.

Perry’s rhetoric simply does not dovetail with his record.

Ron Paul, on the other hand sits on the Joint Economic Committee, the House Committee on Financial Services, and is Chairman of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy. Paul has held a steadfast position on fiscal responsibility for over thirty years and has a voting record to match.

20 plus years ago, back when Perry was expending all his energy promoting Al Gore, Ron Paul was warning the country of the Federal Reserve takeover and the inevitable economic crises that would result.

During an appearance on the Alex Jones Show last week, Ron Paul described Perry as a “flip-flopper”, pointing out that the Texas Governor had also strongly supported the ill fated Hillarycare in 1993.

Anyone with half a brain can clearly see that Perry, the template of a career politician, a man who has flip flopped not only between issues, but even between the two parties, is not going to bring economic prosperity back to the country. The only candidate who has the will to do so and the record to back it up is Ron Paul.

“Congressman Paul has an unparalleled record of championing true conservative principles,” said Ron Paul 2012 Campaign Chairman Jesse Benton in a statement. “Dr. Paul’s ideas of limited Constitutional government, sound money and balanced budgets have won the day.”

“Other candidates are trying to parrot Dr. Paul’s principles, but their records prove they cannot be trusted to live up to their rhetoric. Dr. Paul is the only candidate with the credibility and integrity to restore America now.”

Article written by Steve Watson
Infowars.com
Sept 6, 2011

“The people have to realize when they look at his record… that he is a flip-flopper,” Paul said, pointing out the fact that Rick Perry supported Hillarycare in 1993.

Since declaring his candidacy last month, Perry has attacked both Obama and fellow challenger Mitt Romney on universal healthcare.

A letter heaping praise on Clinton’s proposal surfaced in 2005 when Perry was running against Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison for Texas governor. “I think your efforts in trying to reform the nation’s health care system are most commendable,” Perry told Clinton.

Paul said Perry may “walk off” with the presidency if the American people do not wake up and realize there is little difference between Republicans and Democrats, as evidenced by Perry’s support for healthcare at gunpoint and his role as Al Gore’s Texas campaign manager in 1988. Perry claims he did not know at the time Gore was a radical global warmist.

Jones added that Perry – despite his phony states’ rights and Tea Party rhetoric – is a dyed in the wool globalist who worked behind the scenes to implement a Trans-Texas Corridor slicing through Texas from the Mexican border to Oklahoma. Perry proposed that the border-busting project be financed by private contractors (principally Cintra in Spain) in exchange for the right to levy tolls in Texas.

Perry’s Trans-Texas Corridor typifies the globalist approach to “free trade” where national sovereignty is methodically destroyed. “The Trans Texas Corridor is a big step forward on the road to a North American Union. The concept of the NAU is incompatible with the principles of the Declaration of Independence. Continental ‘Unions’ are the pathway that leads to world governance,” writes Michael Shaw.

As we noted in June, Rick Perry has received the Bilderberg seal of approval and the establishment plans to run him against Obama next year.

“Speculation that Perry is the Bilderberg group’s ace card was prompted by the current political climate, which can largely be gleaned from the fact that Perry is a longtime, unwavering supporter of the NAFTA Superhighway and related infrastructure projects,” wrote AFP’s Jim Tucker in June. “These pave the way for the Bilderberg-supported North American Union (NAU) proposal that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico.”

Perry demonstrated his contempt for the law when he traveled to Istanbul, Turkey, in 2007 to attend the Bilderberg meeting. The Logan Act bars public officials from meeting with private citizens to make policy. “The fact that Bilderberg has a proven track record of creating consensus for policy that is enacted shortly down the line also betrays the group as wholly undemocratic and criminal in its secrecy, further violating the Logan Act,” Paul Joseph Watson wrote at the time.

Perry also pushed through the property rights shredding SB 1048, a bill implementing public private partnerships, or P3s, that “are part and parcel of the United Nations’ Agenda 21,” Terri Hall wrote for San Antonio Transportation Policy Examiner on August 15. “Two of the purposes of Agenda 21 are to abolish private property and restrict mobility and P3s act as the vehicle to do it. Perry made P3s a centerpiece of his transportation policy since he stepped in as governor.”

Mussolini – who defined fascism as corporatism – described the P3s of his day as “consortia” and were the economic foundation of his authoritarian regime.

Perry demonstrated his affinity for eugenics and the globalists when he issued an executive order in 2007 mandating all school girls get Gardasil injections. Fortunately for Texan school girls, the legislature overturned Perry’s order, issued at the behest of pharma giant Merck & Co.

“He tried to be a good Republican by doing what big business lobbyists paid him to do and now finds that conflicts directly with what the good Republicans of the anti-vaccine religious right want him to do. He cannot have it both ways, so he’s chosen the latter,” writes Jim Edwards, relying on the false right-vs-left paradigm to explain Perry’s actions.

In fact, as this chart reveals, Merck and other pharma corporations have donated money to both political parties, which are the same political party, as Ron Paul notes in the above interview with Alex Jones.

Depopulation through eugenics is a cornerstone of the elite’s philosophy. The Carnegie Corporation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and the Ford Foundation have all push “population control” for over a century. In 1952, the Rockefellers established the Population Council, a eugenics operation.

As we have documented, the Rockefeller Foundation has pioneered “anti-fertility vaccines” and worked with the UN Population Fund, World Bank and World Health Organization to reduce world population.

Rick Perry is the globalist choice to follow Barry Obama, who was sold to the American people as a savior following the Bush regime. He promised “change” and an end to the wars initiated under his predecessor, but continued Bush’s policies after he swept into office.

Ron Paul told Alex Jones’ audience that the American people should pay close attention to Perry and look beyond his Tea Party rhetoric (for instance, slamming the Federal Reserve) and examine his past deeds as a minion of the elite.

Article written by Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
September 1, 2011

Even I have to admit that I find Ron Paul interesting and appealing. His supporters are passionate, vocal, and are willing to speak with their wallets. During the last Presidential election season, I found it interesting that even at some of the most liberal universities in the country, you could see students holding his signs and advertising his cause with the same fervor as their liberal counterparts would hold their "Obama" signs. The "Ron Paul Revolution" signs where everywhere! What makes Ron Paul so interesting? What makes him interesting is also what makes many mainstream conservatives hate him.

First, Ron Paul is strictly anti-war. He has an "isolationist" philosophy that believes that the United States should choose to not intervene in world issues that do not directly affect our country. He was an outspoken critic of the war in Iraq, as well as the war in Afghanistan. To this day, he is trying to end the war in Afghanistan, an idea that is much more popular now than it has ever been before.

His opposition to war appears at times to be more about the costs of war and less about the human toll or the rights of other nations, but this should not be a surprise to anyone. Ron Paul is if nothing else one of the most fiscally conservative modern politicians. All wars result in borrowing money from other nations for funding, and Congressman Paul has stood firm in his opposition to adding to the national debt to fight wars. Clearly, any neo-con who likes war and "spreading democracy" as part of their platform would abhor Mr. Paul.

Another reason why Ron Paul is so disliked by some conservatives is because of his stance on social issues. While he is strongly pro-life and in favor of overturning Roe v. Wade, he has repeatedly stated that he believes the federal government should be out of the abortion issue. "We don't need a federal abortion police," Paul once said. It is clear the Paul does not support a federal ban on abortion, which could anger many of the strongest supporters of the rights of the unborn.

Due to his anti-federalism philosophy, Congressman Paul believes that marriage is a religious institution and that the federal government should not dictate who marries who. He has repeatedly said he would not support a Constitutional amendment that would define marriage as between one man and one woman. This has angered many of the religious right, as well as other social conservatives, who believe the federal government should step in to "protect traditional marriage." This issue could be one of the major ones that will continue to prevent Paul from being a serious 2012 presidential candidate.

Ron Paul also wants to do away with the "War on Drugs." He claims that this has been a costly government bureaucracy that has only served to increase crime, and not prevent it. Part of this seems to be his libertarian streak, where people should be allowed to do what they wish with their bodies, so long as it is not hurting anyone else. But when you look a little deeper, it's easy to see Paul's fiscal conservatism shining through. He looks at the War on Drugs as another wasteful and massive government spending program. He sees that it puts some non-violent offenders into the jail and prison systems, where taxpayers have to fund their housing and basic needs. This issue has angered many conservatives that I know personally, who feel that we need even stricter penalties for those who use and sell illicit drugs.

While certainly not the last issue that offends many conservatives, Ron Paul has repeatedly defended the earmark process, saying that it leads to more transparency in fund allocation and ultimately less federal government intervention. Both Republicans and Democrats alike have been critical of earmarks in the news lately. Earmarks, at times, seemed to be the main issue of John McCain's failed 2008 Presidential run. Paul's insistence that earmark elimination would not save any money has aggravated those on the left and the right. (http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/earmark-reform/ )

Ron Paul will continue to be a divisive figure within the Republican Party for a long time to come. But even his harshest of critics should recognize that he has been pivotal in increasing the awareness for the need of national discussion on the issues of taxes, trade, and the wastes of the federal government. There is little doubt that Paul will once again run for President in 2012, and while I may never claim to cast my support, I more than look forward to hearing his dissenting voice at the Republican primary debates.

Source of information: http://www.ronpaul.com

Victor Lee is a conservative author, commentator, and entrepreneur.
His blog can be found at http://www.newlyconservative.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Victor_Q_Lee

“Answering the question, “If the Texas Republican primary were held today, which presidential candidate would you be most likely to vote for?” 22 percent of those polled selected Mr. Paul. Just 17 percent of respondents voted in favor of Mr. Perry,” reports the State Column.

The survey was conducted by Azimuth Research Group.

Paul has lambasted Rick Perry as another RINO Republican, a wolf in sheep’s clothing who poses as a firebrand conservative and yet through his actions has proven himself to be an establishment figure.

“[Governor Perry] is getting into the race, I think, doesn’t bother me at all, obviously because he pretty much represents the status quo. And the other candidates, in one way or the other, are part of the status quo. And I represent something different,” Paul said earlier this week.

Congressman Paul has made waves this week following controversy over the establishment media’s deliberate policy to ignore his candidacy, an issue that became the focus of a Jon Stewart Daily Show skit that has since gone viral and received millions of views after being posted on the Drudge Report.

In the days following the fallout from the straw poll result, the establishment media has now seemingly switched tactics. Instead of simply pretending Ron Paul doesn’t exist, they have resorted to re-hashing a decades-old smear about racist comments that were never even made or approved by Paul, a claim that was thoroughly debunked during the last presidential election cycle four years ago.

Watch Ron Paul’s bombshell new campaign ad below that is upsetting many amongst the GOP establishment.

Article written by Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
August 17, 2011

I appreciate what you've done to wake up a portion of sleeping Americans in past years, but am disgusted that you have apparently sold out to the elite global bankers that finance your lifestyle.

We've tried it your way, and we've tried it the Socialist way. Perhaps it's time we tried it the Constitutional way and support Ron Paul.

In a shocking act of mass public deception, Fox News attempted to skew Ron Paul’s 2011 CPAC straw poll win by representing it with footage from the previous year’s CPAC event, at which Mitt Romney supporters had loudly booed the result, another example of the continuing dirty tricks campaign being waged against Paul by the establishment media.

Congressman Paul replicated his 2010 victory over Mitt Romney by defeating the former Governor of Massachusetts for a second consecutive year at the annual CPAC conference.

However, before anchor Bill Hemmer introduced a segment concerning the story, Fox News played a clip of the 2010 announcement of the poll results, during which Mitt Romney supporters had loudly booed Ron Paul’s victory, passing off last year’s footage as representative of this year’s event.

Hemmer then proceeded to state, “In the end he was the winner, probably not the reaction he was hoping for,” describing the reaction as “mixed applause and boos,” before directly asking Ron Paul if he knew who was booing him.

“Who was in the audience booing you, did you get a name, did you get an ID on those people?” asked Hemmer.

In reality, there were hardly any boos after Ron Paul was announced as the 2011 CPAC winner, the result was met with a massively positive reaction, only Fox News deemed it necessary to hide that fact from their viewers. The video clip above shows the real footage from the 2011 event, proving that Fox News had attempted to deceive Americans into thinking that Paul’s victory was unpopular, by deliberately using the wrong footage.

A separate We Are Change Oklahoma clip of the 2011 straw poll victory confirms that Paul’s win was met overwhelmingly by a loud chorus of cheers and applause.

This is the second time in the space of a week that Fox News has deliberately used dirty tricks to try and ostracize Ron Paul by discrediting the legitimacy of his potential candidacy for president.

A Fox News poll released earlier this week which asked who would make the best president included many of the potential candidates that Ron Paul trounced in the CPAC straw poll, yet the Congressman’s name was not even included in the survey.

Exemplifying again how the establishment consistently tries to derail Paul’s momentum by ignoring his very existence, obscure names like John Thune and Jon Huntsman were included in the Fox poll and yet Paul was omitted entirely.

While Fox News continues to act as an accommodating platform for the pied pipers of the hijacked tea party movement, people like Tea Party Caucus leader Michele Bachmann and Sarah Palin, real conservatives like Ron Paul and his son Senator Rand Paul are subject to dirty tricks and underhanded ploys.

Given the energetic power of his grass roots base, the establishment is scared to death of Ron Paul building any kind of momentum as the 2012 campaign race nears, which is why they have to resort to pulling stunts like this to hoax the American people into thinking that the message of liberty and freedom is unpopular, when in reality it is spreading like wildfire and would completely overrun the status quo if Ron Paul was allowed to communicate on a level playing field.

Article written by Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
February 16, 2011