The choice of thinking people everywhere

Ultimately, Ron Paul is the obvious Republican choice to anyone with an IQ above room temperature (Kucinich is the obvious Democratic choice). That's why thinking people from all political persuasions (liberals, conservatives, libertarians, etc.) are getting behind Ron Paul. Sure, Dennis Kucinich (www.Dennis4President.com) probably better represents the views of many NewsTarget readers, and Kucinich no doubt represents the best choice among Democratic candidates, but it's pretty clear at this point that Kucinich is not going to beat Clinton or Obama (www.barackobama.com) for the nomination. Ron Paul, on the other hand, actually has a realistic shot at winning some Republican primaries. For starters, he's raised more money online — and garnered more grassroots supports — than any presidential candidate in U.S. history!

Let's face it: All the smart people are supporting either Dennis Kucinich or Ron Paul. It's the not-too-bright, do-as-they're-told mainstream idiots who are supporting Clinton, Guliani, Huckabee and other mainstream candidates. Obama's supporters are somewhere in between: At least Obama is a bit of an outsider, and he's a far better choice than Clinton for numerous reasons. If given a strict choice between Clinton and Obama, I'd choose Obama without hesitation.

Voting for Clinton or Huckabee requires no thought whatsoever. It only requires doing what you're told and believing in yet more lies from dishonest politicians who are hopelessly corrupted by predatory corporations that thrive on war, disease and deception. It's the idiots of America who are supporting these candidates, and we must all pray that these idiots are not in the majority when Election Day arrives. Any democracy in which the idiots become the majority is doomed to fail (as ours is).

What do I mean by "idiots" when it comes to voting? It's simple: People who strictly vote along party lines are complete idiots. Voters must consider the individuals, not merely the party. People who also vote for candidates simply because of their religious affiliation are not too bright, either. Religious affiliation does not qualify a candidate to direct this nation's economic policies, executive actions or respect for individual liberties. Certainly, it's important to elect a candidate who respects religious freedoms, and when it comes to respecting such freedoms, there's no one stronger than Paul.

It's also idiotic to vote for a candidate just because he hunts. It's hysterically funny to see candidates like Huckabee shooting helpless birds on camera just so he can demonstrate to all the dumbed-down hick voters in Middle America that he, too, is capable of killing birds with a shotgun (although he apparently has better aim than Cheney). Shooting innocent animals should disqualify anyone from becoming president, in my opinion.

Smart people evaluate each candidate's integrity, skills and philosophies. And once that evaluation is conducted, it's a no brainer to see that Ron Paul is the only realistic candidate who has both solid integrity and solid ideas that would restore our freedoms and protect our future. He's the Paul Revere of modern America, and while I don't agree with Ron Paul on every single thing (and neither should you), I agree with him so strongly on his core principles that he's the obvious choice for leading this nation into a better future.

Continue reading Join the Ron Paul Revolution to Restore Health Freedom to America