Because it has abandoned moral absolutes and its historic Christian faith, the U.S. is moving closer to a Nazi-style totalitarianism, warns a former German member of the Hitler Youth in a new book.

"Every day brings this nation closer to a Nazi-style totalitarian abyss," writes Hilmar von Campe, now a U.S. citizen, and author of Defeating the Totalitarian Lie: A Former Hitler Youth Warns America

Von Campe has founded the national Institute for Truth and Freedom to fight for a return to constitutional government in the U.S. – a key, he believes, to keeping America free.

"It took me a long time to understand and define the nature of National Socialism," says von Campe. "And, unfortunately, their philosophy continues to flourish under different labels remaining a menace to America and free human society."

He writes: "The most painful part of defining National Socialism was to recognize my own moral responsibility for the Nazi disaster and their crimes against humanity. It boiled down to accepting the truth that 'as I am, so is my nation,' and realizing that if every German was like me, it was no wonder that the nation became a cesspool of gangsters. This realization is as valid today for any person in any nation as it was then, and it is true for America and every American now."

"Democratic procedures can be subverted and dishonest politicians are like sand in the gearbox, abundant, everywhere and destructive," he writes. "What I see in America today is people painting their cabins while the ship goes down. Today in America we are witnessing a repeat performance of the tragedy of 1933 when an entire nation let itself be led like a lamb to the Socialist slaughterhouse. This time, the end of freedom is inevitable unless America rises to her mission and destiny."

Cracking the Code: The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America

The problem with the so-called "income tax" is threefold,

1. there is a narrow technical definition of income, wages, salaries, etc. according to the tax code, so that it conforms with the definition of an excise tax, or an exercise of privilege, namely those receipts earned by military officers, those employed by the government, receipts earned by virtue of being a corporation, etc.
2. most people only understand the common use of such terms when paying their taxes, and
3. the lower tax courts have consistently misinterpreted these laws when confronted with the truth, despite clear Supreme Court rulings to the contrary.

(From the back cover) For the 64 years of its existence, the U. S. Internal Revenue Code has been ridiculed, feared and despised by virtually everyone. And why not?

As presented by the Internal Revenue Service, the code appears illogical, inconsistent and incomprehensible. As presented, the code defies practically the entire Bill of Rights: requiring citizens to testify against themselves, allowing searches and seizures without warrants, levying fines and penalties without trials and imposing a tax on the basic right to earn a living. As presented, the IRC would appear to turn everything we all thought we had learned in grade school English and Civics on its head.

Is it possible that we all just misunderstood those simple lessons? Maybe.

But researcher, analyst and scholar Peter E. Hendrickson believes that after Cracking the Code, you'll agree that what has been misunderstood is the 3,413,780 word monstrosity itself and how, and to whom, it applies.

Hendrickson delves deep into the history, statutes and case law behind the Code to reveal its startling and liberating secrets; and unless you live in a cave, you need to know what he has uncovered. Once you've finished Cracking the Code, the tax laws will never mean the same thing to you, or your bank account, again!

Rush Limbaugh's second book, "See, I Told You So" is a great follow up to "The Way Things Ought To Be" and a conservative classic in its own right. And although most the book concerns the initial months of the Clinton Administration and the author's anticipation of administration policies, it's interesting to study his projections of the future and compare them to the actual events in their aftermath.

In trademark Rush fashion, the book begins on a note of optimism with Rush recounting past run-ins with star athlete Danny Ainge as well as his former high school football coach. The stories he tells reveal life lessons that anyone can implement in his own life, and they provide the reader with personal inspiration in addition to entertainment value. According to Rush, the American Dream is still alive. To achieve your dreams you only need passion, hard work, and the pursuit of excellence. Too often these ideals are lost in the everyday bickering of political life, and by injecting them back into the national debate, Rush Limbaugh brings a bit of Jimmy Stewart back into the political landscape.

As he did in his first book, Rush then moves into a full-fledged examination of the American culture war, highlighting the liberal bias of school textbooks, the degradation of traditional values, and the dumbing-down of America. As always the book is filled with tidbits of humor, written in a witty style unique to the author and pleasing to the reader. Other aspects of the book assess the then future Clinton presidency and Rush's opinions on how such an administration would govern. These chapters seem almost prophetic in nature following the aftermath of an administration bereft with corruption and scandal (and a president that was impeached, just as Rush predicted).

Overall, if you enjoy The Rush Limbaugh Show, then you'll love "See, I Told You So". It's classic Limbaugh, featuring a bit of irreverent humor interspersed with insightful political/social commentary and wit.

About Author: Britt Gillette is author of The Dittohead's Guide To Adult Beverages (Regnery 2005), a political humor book for fans of Rush Limbaugh.

Godless: The Church of Liberalism

From the Publisher:Many Americans are outraged by liberal hostility to traditional religion. But as Ann Coulter reveals in this, her most explosive book yet, to focus solely on the Left's attacks on our Judeo-Christian tradition is to miss a larger point: liberalism is a religion – a godless one.And it is now entrenched as the state religion of this county.Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, it bears all the attributes of a religion. In Godless, Coulter throws open the doors of The Church of Liberalism, showing us its sacraments (abortion), its holy writ (Roe v. Wade), its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal), its clergy (public school teachers), its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free), its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the absolute moral authority of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland), and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident).Then, of course, there's the liberal creation myth: Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.For liberals, evolution is the touchstone that separates the enlightened from the benighted. But Coulter neatly reverses the pretense that liberals are rationalists guided by the ideals of free inquiry and the scientific method. She exposes the essential truth about Darwinian evolution that liberals refuse to confront: it is bogus science.

Despite the wide ranging media blacklisting, Ed Klein's book still did well enough to be listed as a best seller. On his blog, former Congressman John LeBoutillier claims that this is a victory..

The stunning news that Ed Klein's book, The Truth about Hillary, has reached the coveted number 2 spot on the prestigious New York Times bestseller list for July 10 is a huge victory for some – and a shattering defeat for others.

Let us examine:

Winners:

1) Ed Klein, the author, who has been relentlessly trashed by the Clinton Spin Machine, has now been vindicated by the smashing success of his book. A completely honorable man and a credible journalist, the pro-Hillary camp had tried to discredit him and his book. And even some prominent conservatives – with their own selfish agendas – aided this trashing. But getting to number 2 on the Times�?T list has vindicated Ed Klein.

2) Newsmax.com, the only news organization to give THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY an honest shot. Newsmax has been supportive – and fair – about the book. Using its online site and emailing updates, Newsmax.com has proven the truly revolutionary power of the Internet.

3) Talk Radio: working in conjunction with the Internet – specifically Newsmax – hundreds of talk radio hosts – led by Sean Hannity (who had the first interview with Ed Klein) and Rush Limbaugh, who correctly analyzed the Clinton Game Plan on his show – have driven Klein�?Ts book up the charts.

The Clinton Spin Machine has been able to keep Klein off the so-called Mainstream Media but the �?~new media�?T – i.e. the Internet and talk radio – has now proven something revolutionary in marketing and politics: this Internet/radio combo is as powerful – if not more so – than the traditional broadcast and cable TV networks.

4) Sean Hannity & Lou Dobbs, the only two TV hosts with the guts to let Klein appear on their cable TV shows.

The Losers:

1) The Clinton Spin Machine: they wanted to suppress this book. Instead, their efforts only fueled interest – and sales. They would have been better off just ignoring the book.

2) The mainstream media – CBS, NBC, ABC, MSNBC and CBS – all have lost heavily here. Because while they froze Klein off the air, the book zoomed up the charts anyway. The lesson? Future authors – and other products, too – will now see they can �?~end run�?T these TV networks and reach the people anyway. Make no mistake about it: this is a revolution in the business/marketing/book-selling world.

3) Those so-called conservatives who blasted the Klein book in order to suck-up to the Left. These turncoats aren�?Tt worth a damn; they have their own agendas, some even have their own Hillary books coming out soon and were jealous of Ed Klein�?Ts success. They have chosen the losing side here.

4) Hillary Clinton. She is a loser because she tried everything – including an appearance with the Reverend Billy Graham – to counter the Klein book. Instead, the book now has �?~legs�?T and a life of its own. Why? Partly because her failed suppression effort – confirmed last Sunday by CNN�?Ts Howard Kurtz – and mostly because Red State book readers outnumber Blue State censors.

Conclusion:

THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY was the first primary of the 2008 presidential campaign.

The results?

Ed Klein creamed Hillary Clinton.

I can't argue with that. My hope is that we take the gift that Klein's book gives us and use it properly. Between "The Truth about Hillary" and Candice Jackson's book "Their Lives," it has become rather clear that Hillary knew about Bill's philandering and should no longer be able to hide behind the victim routine. The clear cut way for Republicans to take a chunk out of the female vote for Hillary is to stress this constantly. Many women will have a hard time supporting a hypocrite who flies against her feminist values in order to achieve power through her husband. If she can't stand up to Bill, how can she stand up to Al Qaeda? There is a plethora of ways to attack this issue. Divide and conquer, it's that simple. I hope we don't faill to utilize this ammo. We shall see…

more…

According to World Ahead Publishing, Google removed an ad for author Candace Jackson's book "Their Lives: The Women Targeted by the Clinton Machine," after originally approving the banner ads which displayed the book's cover or pictures of the Clintons. Some ads also included such statements as that of former White House volunteer Kathleen Willey, a victim of Clinton's sexual advances, who stated "The true nightmare Bill and Hillary put me through.""Google's decision to reverse its prior approval and shut down this banner ad campaign reeks of political bias," fumed author Jackson.

According to Eric Jackson, World Ahead Publishing's president, Google had approved the campaign and it was performing "very strongly," after it made its debut on May 31. Google yanked the ad campaign June 9, however.

Google's response, says World Ahead: the company's policies ban display ads that attack an individual.

A Google spokesman told DMnews.com that while some ads for "Their Lives" were rejected, others are still running on the company's network. He rejected the claim that the ads were accepted or rejected because of their political views.

"These decisions are based on our policies, not political views," Google spokesman Mike Mayzel told DMnews.com. "We have routinely accepted and rejected ads for materials that are for or against a wide variety of public views."

That's a huge load. When nutcase left wing organizations were out there calling Tom Delay the Devil himself, I really doubt Google was restraining them….

more…

Here it comes! Today is the day that the much hyped book "The Truth about Hillary" hits bookstores. Here's the latest from Newsmax.

While even Clinton critics are warning that Ed Klein's book "The Truth About Hillary" may backfire by reinvigorating Mrs. Clinton's image as a victim, privately some Democrats say they're aren't so sure.

Anticipating today's "Truth" release, Eric Hauser, a Democratic activist who was press secretary to former Sen. Bill Bradley during the 2000 presidential primaries, said he fears the book could hurt her political viability.

"There are widespread and legitimate concerns about her ability to win an election," he told Knight Ridder.
One-time Hillary advisor Dick Morris warned last week that he thought that Klein's unsubstantiated allegation about Chelsea's conception would backfire actually help Hillary.

But in his New York Post column today Morris notes that new charges about Bill Clinton's ongoing infidelity threaten to compromise the new image of their "rehabilitated" marriage.

"The Ed Klein book with its revelations of Bill⿔s current philandering puts Hillary in a tough spot," the top political consultant says. "If she pretends not to notice, she looks like a fool at best and a conniving politician who values power more than having a good marriage at worst."

Morris makes a good point about Bill Clinton's philandering. There are many Democratic voters out there who are upset with Hillary for putting up with what Bill has done. It makes her look weak and her marriage a joke.

more…

If you want to get an idea of what to expect from the new book by Ed Klein, Check this out.

NRO: Do you think more is being made out of some of the "dirt" the more salacious gossipy stuff in your book than should be?

Klein: The Truth About Hillary is a comprehensive biography, encompassing both her personal and political life. Vanity Fair chose to excerpt a part of the book about political life, while other news sources have chosen to focus on the personal. My book is much broader than any representation that has appeared in the media so far.

NRO: How many times do you use the word "lesbian" in your book? Why point out she had friends who were lesbians? Do we need to go there?

Klein: Hillary⿔s politics were shaped by the culture of radical feminism and lesbianism at Wellesley College in the 1960s. This is paramount in exploring the political life of Hillary Clinton.

How could someone write a comprehensive biography of Hillary Clinton without investigating the rumors that have long circulated about her? I've gone further than any other journalist in exploring the question of her sexuality, which is often the first thing people wonder about her: Is she misrepresenting herself as a doting wife to Bill Clinton? How can she stand his chronic infidelity?

As for the number of times the word appears in the book, I don't know. But I'm sure there are some in the Clinton campaign counting right now.

NRO: One more sex thing. You write: "Hillary Clinton only had herself to blame for the talk about her sex life." Can there ever really be a good reason for this, never mind in her case?

Klein: The Clintons themselves made sex an integral part of our national political discourse at the turn of the century. There⿔s no way of getting around sex when it comes to the Clintons.

NRO: Are you nervous putting out a product that seems to be based on a lot of anonymous sources?

Klein: Were Woodward and Bernstein?

Look, no reporter likes to use anonymous sources. But most people are afraid of invoking the wrath of Hillary Clinton, and so they will talk about her only on condition of anonymity.

I interviewed nearly 100 people who know Hillary, including classmates from high school, college, and law school; Democratic activists and party officials; White House support staff, speechwriters, and military aides; Cabinet officers, senators and congressmen; and other intimates of the Clintons.

I have had more than 40 years of experience as a serious journalist dealing with sources, both Left and Right, on and off the record. And while writing The Truth About Hillary, I scrupulously checked all my sources for fairness and accuracy.

NRO: You've got good liberal credentials. Is this book the end of that?

Klein: I have never had an ideological ax to grind. I⿔m a registered independent ⿦quot; a reporter who goes where the truth leads me. And I intend to stay that way and let the chips fall where they may.

NRO: Do you believe, as Hillary expressed around impeachment time, that there was a "vast-right-wing conspiracy" out to do her husband in?

Klein: The only conspiracy that existed during impeachment time was Bill and Hillary⿔s attempt to hide the truth.

NRO: Are you now part of some "Republican scream machine"? What was your intention in writing the book?

Klein: I⿔m a journalist who writes about fascinating people. I spent many years writing about the Kennedys. But the Clintons have eclipsed them in national interest. Right now, Hillary is the most fascinating woman in America.

I don⿔t know if all Republicans will like this book, but I call them as I see them.

NRO: Did you vote for Bill Clinton?

Klein: No.

NRO: You're a New Yorker. Did you vote for Hillary for senator? Would you vote for Hillary for president?

Klein: No and no.

I think Elizabeth Moynihan, Senator Moynihan⿔s wife, had it right when she told me that Hillary is ⿯duplicitous.⿝ Hillary acts as though she is chosen by God, and that gives her the right to use any means to justify her ends.

If she becomes president, it⿔s going to be deja Clinton all over again. And as far as I⿔m concerned, we⿔ve already had the Clinton presidency for its full constitutional eight years.

I think what Klein just said above is very true and I think voters in 2008 are going to have to consider that. I believe that a good bloc of voters does not want to have "deja Clinton" all over again.

To continue reading the rest of the article,

Note: Sean Hannity will be interviewing Klein tommorow on his nationally syndicated radio show. Klein will be there to launch the first day of his book's availability. Don't miss it!

more…